On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:46:47AM -0000, phi...@apache.org wrote: > Author: philip > Date: Tue Mar 2 10:46:46 2010 > New Revision: 917950 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917950&view=rev > Log: > * subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c (log_find_operative_revs): Use %ld > rather than %d to format svn_revnum_t.
What about using this? subversion/include/svn_types.h:#define SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT "ld" Stefan > > Modified: > subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c > > Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c?rev=917950&r1=917949&r2=917950&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c (original) > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c Tue Mar 2 10:46:46 2010 > @@ -8705,7 +8705,8 @@ > rel_path, pool); > > SVN_ERR(svn_mergeinfo_parse(&log_entry_as_mergeinfo, > - apr_psprintf(pool, "%s:%d", path, > revision), > + apr_psprintf(pool, "%s:%ld", > + path, revision), > pool)); > > SVN_ERR(mergeinfo_in_catalog(&in_catalog, &subtree_missing_this_rev, > @@ -8739,7 +8740,8 @@ > } > > SVN_ERR(svn_mergeinfo_parse(&log_entry_as_mergeinfo, > - apr_psprintf(pool, "%s:%d", > missing_path, revision), > + apr_psprintf(pool, "%s:%ld", > + missing_path, revision), > log_baton->result_pool)); > unmerged_for_key = apr_hash_get(log_baton->unmerged_catalog, > subtree_missing_this_rev, > -- printf("Eh???/n");
