On Wed, 2010-03-17, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-11, I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> >> Excellent, too.  Just one nit: it looks like you intended to rename the
> >> argument "wcprop_changes" to "props".
> > 
> > Renamed in r924229.
> 
> Thanks.  For the record, I hadn't ignored your review -- I just had left the
> changes sitting uncommitted in my working copy yesterday when Distraction
> #1587 came to visit or something.

No problem.  I just came back to it because I'm trying to understand the
code that uses it.

- Julian


Reply via email to