Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > On Mar 25, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > > OK. I've just noticed that every caller of svn_wc__db_wclock_set > > passes zero for levels_to_lock, perhaps it doesn't need to be a > > parameter at all. > > This is here strictly for backward compat. The access batons still > have the notion of 'levels to lock' and we need to ensure that they > still function correctly, even in the new world. 'levels to lock' > should not be exposed through the wc-ng APIs at all: users either get > to lock the entire tree (rooted at some subdir, of course), or none.
I added this note of yours in r927378. Also I fixed another svn_sqlite__bindf "i" parameter type mismatch or two in r927344. (Thought: Maybe we should aim to replace svn_sqlite__bindf() or its "i" format with some alternative that's harder to get wrong.) - Julian
