On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 08:52 -0400, Paul Burba wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Paul Burba <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Julian Foad <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:43 +0100, Julian Foad wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:01 -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > >>> > 1.6.10 tarballs are up, the magic revision is r929659: > >>> > > >>> > http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.10/ > >>> > >>> For me, merge_tests.py 45 77 79 124 126 all fail, on serf/fsfs. > >> > >> If I roll the 1.6.x branch back to r929629, it passes.
D'oh, but trying again with r929629, running them individually, they all fail except 77 which pass: [[[ $ svn-py-test merge 45 77 79 124 126 --http-library=serf --url=http://localhost:12843 --no-cleanup [...] FAIL: merge_tests.py 45: target inherits mergeinfo from nearest ancestor PASS: merge_tests.py 77: subtrees added after start of merge range are ok [...] ]]] Don't know what's up with my testing to cause this discrepancy between the full 'make davautocheck' and individual tests, and haven't yet repeated them. > The tests pass for me over ra_neon, but all except 77 fail over > ra_serf. > > The likely culprit would seem r929603...can you confirm that is > > where the failure starts? You mean r929630 I believe. Not confirmed yet. > > Do you see the same failures on trunk? No I don't see those failures on trunk, and I don't see them in 1.6.9. - Julian
