On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 15:48, Jon Trowbridge <t...@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de> wrote: >> That doesn't make WebDAV a bad protocol, but it might make this *specific* >> use of WebDAV a sub-optimal choice for the specific server platform. > > Given the large number of round-trips required to do anything, I'm > perfectly comfortable calling WebDAV a bad protocol. Â YMMV, > particularly if you don't care about latency or you assume that the > client and server are always on the same LAN.
That was our use of DeltaV, which has been ripped out in 1.7. (well... newer hotness, and some back-compat remaining) Cheers, -g
