"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpil...@collab.net> writes: > Does this mean that we no longer have the weirdness that 'svn cp REPOS WC' > would create a tree like this: > > WC/target # scheduled as a real copy target > WC/target/subthing # annotated as 'copied', but not a copy target > WC/target/subthing2 # annotated as 'copied', but not a copy target > ... > > but an 'svn merge' that adds a tree would do this: > > WC/target # scheduled as a real copy target > WC/target/subthing # scheduled as a real copy target > WC/target/subthing2 # scheduled as a real copy target > ... > > ?
That has changed, but I think it was before r942802. -- Philip
