On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:47, Stefan Küng <tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22.05.2010 18:42, Greg Stein wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 09:42, Mark Phippard<markp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Stefan Küng<tortoise...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On the TSVN mailing list, a user reported problems when accessing the >>>> codeplex repositories with TSVN linked against the svn trunk. >>>> >>>> Further testing on my side revealed that this problem is due to the fact >>>> that serf is now the default DAV lib. >>>> >>>> When using neon, everything works as expected. >>>> >>>> For example: >>>> svn ls https://mvvmfoundation.svn.codeplex.com/svn >>>> with serf leads to: >>>> >>>> subversion\subversion\svn\list-cmd.c:289: (apr_err=175003) >>>> subversion\subversion\libsvn_client\list.c:272: (apr_err=175003) >>>> subversion\subversion\libsvn_client\list.c:73: (apr_err=175003) >>>> subversion\subversion\libsvn_ra_serf\serf.c:895: (apr_err=175003) >>>> subversion\subversion\libsvn_ra_serf\serf.c:833: (apr_err=175003) >>>> svn: The PROPFIND response did not include the requested resourcetype >>>> value >>>> >>>> Most other commands don't work either when using serf: >>>> svn checkout >>>> svn log >>>> svn diff >>>> ... >>>> >>>> Using neon works ok. >>> >>> Aren't they just emulating a Subversion server and the Subversion >>> protocol? They have probably just not implemented it correctly. >> >> Exactly. >> >> On baseline collections, the<response> element says it is for >> "/!svn/bc/52790/" rather than "/svn/!svn/bc/52790/" (BUG!). Therefore, >> the properties get associated with the wrong path, and when ra_serf >> attempts to find the<resourcetype> property for path >> "/svn/!svn/bc/52790/" it does not find it. >> >> Neon uses a different strategy for determining "is this a directory?", >> so a property lookup isn't used, so it doesn't break on this >> mis-labeled path. >> >>> ... >> >> Does anybody know how to report this bug to the Codeplex people? > > Try the issue tracker for SvnBridge: > http://svnbridge.codeplex.com/workitem/list/basic
I've filed an issue: http://svnbridge.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=15305 Please feel free to annotate/track/vote for. (the email address you gave me is no longer valid; at msft, v-...@microsoft.com addresses are contractors, so I presume that contractor has departed) Cheers, -g
