On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 18:50 +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > If the working file
> > contents are not equal to the pristine contents then the timestamps
> > should not be equal.
> 
> That might not be clear, I'll try again: if the working file contents
> are not equal to the the pristine contents then the working file
> timestamp should not be stored.  Some other timestamp, or no timestamp
> at all, should be stored.

Thanks, Philip.  I have reverted it in r948379, as I discovered that the
reason I originally made that "simplification" was to avoid using
svn_wc__text_base_path() when compiled with SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE,
but I had already solved that problem in r947744.

- Julian


Reply via email to