Greg Stein <[email protected]> writes: > (*) and if the work items cannot succeed, then we have problems. I > could imagine the process is killed during the wq run, some source > files are torched, and then the destination is cleaned up (ie. wq is > run again). Without the source files, then we'd have problem > completing the work items. Thus, an argument exists for stashing away > copies of all (modified or unversioned) sources into temp files.
That's what I've been implementing. > Non-modified are just pulled from the pristine store. I don't see an benefit in this. Whether we copy from the pristine or the unmodified working we still have to make a copy. It might even be more efficient to copy from the unmodified working where keywords/eols are already expanded. Using the pristine would allow us to delay the copy but that doesn't seem to be an advantage. -- Philip
