On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 13:58, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: >... > Greg: See above. We've plenty of WC-NG plumbing to deal with before ever > needing to engage the topic of "which of a handful of call and response > paradigms will do the job and make us happiest". Can we defer that decision > until later? Maybe a more mature WC-NG will help us to make better such > decisions.
That's why I didn't engage in the first place. I didn't like it, and didn't feel a need to respond *now*. Stefan pushed on it, so I responded with my thoughts. *shrug* It's why I got so frustrated and slashed back so hard last night. I think it is wrong to focus on performance problems and APIs today. You're right: there is a ton to do. We know that, and we have plans for the next N steps already. Until we complete those plans, then the rest is moot. And *pushing* on us before we complete those plans is annoying, to say the least. Let us complete what we know is necessary, and THEN get a good look at what is left to enable clients to function as efficiently as we believe they can. Cheers, -g
