> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: vrijdag 25 juni 2010 10:02
> To: Daniel Näslund
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Patch] - Fix paths on OS/2 - svn-paths.diff [1/1]
>
> Daniel Näslund wrote on Fri, 25 Jun 2010 at 07:46 -0000:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:03:17AM +0000, Paul Smedley wrote:
> > > [[[
> > > Fix paths & command prompts for OS/2 by re-using WIN32 #ifdef's
> > >
> > > * subversion/libsvn_subr/dirent_uri.c
> > > * subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
> > > * subversion/libsvn_subr/prompt.c
> > > * subversion/libsvn_ra_local/split_url.c
> > > * subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c
> > > (various): Use WIN32 code for paths with drive letters and
> command
> > > prompts
> > > ]]]
> >
> > I (and probably other people too) have a hard time reading your patch
> > [1]. :)
> >
>
> Yes. Paul, could you please resend (all three) patches in a format we
> can read? That means MIME attachments, or uploading them to a website
> or pastebin and providing a link.
>
> > Why does it look like it's base64 encoded?
> >
>
> base64 only uses the characters [A-Za-z0-9+/]. I forgot or don't know
> how the format Paul used *is* called, however.
It was uuencoded (and my mail client just shows the files as attachments).
If you really want to, you can probably run 'uudecode mailfile' to extract the
attachments.
Bert