Sorry about that, I was in a rush to get it done and wasn't really paying attention. And yes, it should be back ported to the 1.6 branch.
Joe Rozner On Jun 24, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > Applied in r957507. I noticed the patch was against 1.6.12, but it > applied cleanly to trunk. In the future, please make patches against > trunk (and hopefully include a log message). > > Should this be backported to the 1.6.x branch? > > Cheers, > -Hyrum > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Joe Rozner <j...@deadbytes.net> wrote: >> Sorry about that, here is the patch file again as a .txt file. >> >> Joe Rozner >> >> >> On Jun 23, 2010, at 12:25 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: >> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Joe Rozner [mailto:j...@deadbytes.net] >>>> Sent: woensdag 23 juni 2010 5:43 >>>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >>>> Subject: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch >>>> >>>> The ruby bindings were having issues being used with Ruby 1.9 due to >>>> changes in the case syntax. Here is a patch file that fixes the issue. >>>> >>>> Joe Rozner >>>> j...@deadbytes.net >>> >>> Hi Joe, >>> >>> Your patch didn't reach the list. Can you try resending your patch? >>> (Possibly with a .txt extension) >>> >>> I can't check your patch now to check if it has one, but adding a log >>> message to your patch (either in the patch file or in the mail) makes >>> reviewing much easier. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Bert >>> >> >> >>
