Hi Daniel, Daniel Shahaf writes: > Not your fault, but that's not what I meant. What I meant was to check for no > unexpected stderr (e.g., no "svn: warning %s" or similar). > > For example, you could do that by running 'svnrdump -q' and then verifying > that > *nothing* was printed to stderr.
Is this alright? [[[ * cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py (run_test): Run svnrdump with '-q' and check that nothing is printed to stderr. Review by: danielsh ]]] Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py =================================================================== --- subversion/tests/cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py (revision 978841) +++ subversion/tests/cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py (working copy) @@ -73,15 +73,15 @@ def run_test(sbox, dumpfile_name): svntest.actions.run_and_verify_load(sbox.repo_dir, svnadmin_dumpfile) # Create a dump file using svnrdump - r, svnrdump_dumpfile, err = svntest.main.run_svnrdump(sbox.repo_url) + r, svnrdump_dumpfile, err = svntest.main.run_svnrdump('-q', sbox.repo_url) # Check error code if (r != 0): raise svntest.Failure('Result code not 0') # Check the output from stderr - if not err[0].startswith('* Dumped revision'): - raise svntest.Failure('No valid output') + if err: + raise svntest.Failure('Error while running') # Compare the output from stdout svntest.verify.compare_and_display_lines(