On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Bob Archer <bob.arc...@amsi.com> wrote: >> We used to be brutal against adding flags let alone separate >> binaries, >> so why are we so willing to add new binaries willy-nilly? To me, >> as >> an admin, it just makes *so* much sense that a remote dump feature >> be >> tied into "svnadmin dump". -- justin > > I agree this makes sense. > > You could also argue svnmcc should be part of svn.
I personally think that some features of svnmucc are/will move to svn proper. The primary reason they aren't there today is because the implementation wasn't in a stable state, or we didn't want to support these experimental APIs forever. Some of the functionality has shown lasting usefulness, and I think those are likely candidates for inclusion in the core project. -Hyrum
