On 06.08.2010 19:26, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> wrote: > >> Ahem. You guys have forgotten about Justin's RW-master/RO-slave >> replication hack, which *requires* the slave repositories to have the >> same UUID as the master. And that 'svnadmin load' has both --ignore-uuid >> and --force-uuid. >> > When doing any master/slave initial configuration, doing a local > 'svnadmin setuuid' should be sufficient. IOW, I don't see that use > case as driving this need. -- justin >
Exatly. And while that's being done locally, one might just as well do the whole 'svnadmin load' which can implicitly set the UUID. Which means we don't need an 'svnadmin setuuid' since loading a dump is pretty much the only time one might reasonably want to change the repository UUID, IMHO. -- Brane
