On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Peter Samuelson <pe...@p12n.org> wrote: > > [Michael Spang] >> This reverts to using the zlib-provided version, since the old version >> of zlib that was missing this function should be quite rare these >> days. > > Maybe I'm just old ... but I bet there's still some zlib 1.1.4 > out there. Maybe do the following instead? (Untested.)
Yeah that does seem better. Michael
