On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 02:09:03PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 02.09.2010 13:25, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > For now, an svn symlink will show up as an empty file when the patch is > > applied with git. I don't think that's a huge problem. Nice to have, but > > not release critical for Subversion. > > That's not how I read the patch ... I believe git will create a file > whose contents are "link foo" given the example patch in this thread.
Yes, you're right. Thanks for correcting. But still not a release-critical problem. Stefan
