C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 09/02/2010 01:38 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > > dmitry boyarintsev <skalogryz.li...@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> Hello Subversion-dev, > >> > >> I can see, that there's no much of interest in Pascal bindings. > >> Well, that's quite understandable because of Pascal language not > >> being popular. > >> > >> Anyway, I'll publish the headers on my site. > >> > >> Thank you for your great product! > > > > You are more likely to get some response if you send a patch against > > trunk with a log message, see > > > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/general.html#patches > > > > Even if you do that I don't know that there is any great demand for > > Pascal bindings. Are they generated or written by hand? Do they have > > regression tests? Are they tied to any particular environment? > > All great questions, Philip. Another one that's on my mind is, "Is Dmitry > volunteering to stick around and maintain these bindings?" We really try to > avoid drop-and-ignore contributions of this sort, where none of the active > committership appears to be interested (or perhaps even qualified) to > maintain the new code.
Mike, Dmitry said in his original mail that he would support them. Quoting it in full: > Hello SVN people. > > As suggested by Hyrum K. Wright I'm forwarding the mail here. > > I'm wandering if there's an official Pascal (FreePascal or Delphi) > bindings for the Subversion. I've converted C-headers (1.5.6 tag) for > my own needs, and I guess it would be easy for me to catch up with the > trunk as well. > > If they're acceptable, I would like to contribute them for the > project, as well as support and update the bindings with the new > product releases. > > Any suggestions? Do you need to have Pascal bindings? > > thanks, > Dmitry - Julian