"Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] >> >> Perhaps we should simply notify for all nodes? Perhaps each >> individual client should be deciding which notifications to suppress? > > +1 on moving the choice to the clients. (svn has different requirements then > clients like Subclipse). > > Personally (and for AnkhSVN) I don't have an issue with notifying adds and > deletes for the root only. (The fact that it is an add or delete tells that > it's operation changes the state of all descendants)
Root-only delete notification is much easier to implement in the library than in the client. That's because delete notifications for children tend to happen before the parent, and the application has to be organised to allow it to determine that a child will be followed by a parent. -- Philip
