Hi Daniel, Daniel Shahaf writes: > So, you use a top-level pool but never destroy it? > > That's not good. > > Can you please find another solution? (Either get the caller to > guarantee something about the lifetime of the pool they provide (there > is precedent for this), or figure out why close_edit() isn't called (and > possibly patch the faulty driver).
Fixed in r1002502 :) Thanks for the review. -- Ram