Is there a reason not to apply this "let's not reinvent the wheel" patch?
[[[ Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c =================================================================== --- subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (revision 1029231) +++ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (working copy) @@ -2205,15 +2205,14 @@ read_rep_offsets(representation_t **rep_p, return SVN_NO_ERROR; } -/* Combine the revision and offset of the ID to a string that will - * be used as a cache key. Allocations will be made from POOL. +/* Return a string that uniquely identifies the noderev with the + * given ID, for use as a cache key. */ static const char * get_noderev_cache_key(const svn_fs_id_t *id, apr_pool_t *pool) { - return svn_fs_fs__combine_two_numbers(svn_fs_fs__id_rev(id), - svn_fs_fs__id_offset(id), - pool); + const svn_string_t *id_unparsed = svn_fs_fs__id_unparse(id, pool); + return id_unparsed->data; } /* Look up the NODEREV_P for ID in FS' node revsion cache. If noderev ]]] (It does not resolve my test failures.) Daniel