Noorul Islam K M <[email protected]> writes:

> Noorul Islam K M <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Stefan Sperling <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:12:41PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>>
>>>> $ svn lock blah ^/
>>>> subversion/libsvn_client/cmdline.c:330: (apr_err=235000)
>>>> svn: In file 'subversion/libsvn_subr/dirent_uri.c' line 1649: assertion 
>>>> failed (! svn_path_is_url(relative))
>>>> Abort trap (core dumped) 
>>>
>>> Ooops, this patch for for unlock, not lock.
>>> But the same problem happens for unlock.
>>
>> Modified the patch a bit. Attached is the updated one.
>>
>> Log 
>>
>> [[[
>>
>> Make 'svn unlock' verify that both working copy paths and URLs are
>> not passed.
>>
>> * subversion/tests/cmdline/input_validation_tests.py
>>   (invalid_unlock_targets): New test, verifying that svn unlock copes well
>>    with invalid target combinations.
>>
>> * subversion/svn/unlock-cmd.c
>>   (svn_cl__unlock): For consistency with other sub-commands, raise the
>>    SVN_ERR_CL_ARG_PARSING_ERROR if both working copy paths and URLs are
>>    passed, and use the same error message also used elsewhere.
>>
>> Patch by: Noorul Islam K M <noorul{_AT_}collab.net>
>>
>> ]]]
>>
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Noorul
>>
>> Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/input_validation_tests.py
>> ===================================================================
>> --- subversion/tests/cmdline/input_validation_tests.py       (revision 
>> 1030801)
>> +++ subversion/tests/cmdline/input_validation_tests.py       (working copy)
>> @@ -201,6 +201,13 @@
>>      run_and_verify_svn_in_wc(sbox, "svn: Cannot mix repository and working "
>>                               "copy targets", 'lock', target1, target2)
>>  
>> +def invalid_unlock_targets(sbox):
>> +  "wc paths and repo URL target mixture for 'unlock'"
>> +  sbox.build(read_only=True)
>> +  for (target1, target2) in [("iota", "^/"), ("file://", "iota")]:
>> +    run_and_verify_svn_in_wc(sbox, "svn: Cannot mix repository and working "
>> +                             "copy targets", 'unlock', target1, target2)
>> +
>>  ########################################################################
>>  # Run the tests
>>  
>> @@ -223,6 +230,7 @@
>>                invalid_resolved_targets,
>>                invalid_revert_targets,
>>                invalid_lock_targets,
>> +              invalid_unlock_targets,
>>               ]
>>  
>>  if __name__ == '__main__':
>> Index: subversion/svn/unlock-cmd.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- subversion/svn/unlock-cmd.c      (revision 1030801)
>> +++ subversion/svn/unlock-cmd.c      (working copy)
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>  
>>  /*** Includes. ***/
>>  
>> +#include "svn_path.h"
>>  #include "svn_pools.h"
>>  #include "svn_client.h"
>>  #include "svn_error_codes.h"
>> @@ -48,6 +49,8 @@
>>    svn_cl__opt_state_t *opt_state = ((svn_cl__cmd_baton_t *) 
>> baton)->opt_state;
>>    svn_client_ctx_t *ctx = ((svn_cl__cmd_baton_t *) baton)->ctx;
>>    apr_array_header_t *targets;
>> +  svn_boolean_t wc_present = FALSE, url_present = FALSE;
>> +  int i;
>>  
>>    SVN_ERR(svn_cl__args_to_target_array_print_reserved(&targets, os,
>>                                                        opt_state->targets,
>> @@ -59,6 +62,23 @@
>>  
>>    SVN_ERR(svn_cl__eat_peg_revisions(&targets, targets, scratch_pool));
>>  
>> +  /* Check to see if at least one of our paths is a working copy
>> +   * path or a repository url. */
>> +  for (i = 0; i < targets->nelts; ++i)
>> +    {
>> +      const char *target = APR_ARRAY_IDX(targets, i, const char *);
>> +
>> +      if (! svn_path_is_url(target))
>> +    wc_present = TRUE;
>> +      else
>> +    url_present = TRUE;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +  if (url_present && wc_present)
>> +    return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_CL_ARG_PARSING_ERROR, NULL,
>> +                          _("Cannot mix repository and working copy "
>> +                            "targets"));
>> +
>>    return svn_error_return(
>>      svn_client_unlock(targets, opt_state->force, ctx, scratch_pool));
>>  }
>
> I think you missed reviewing this.
>

Stefan,

Once this patch goes, I think we can wrap this issue.

Thanks and Regard
Noorul

Reply via email to