On 12/01/2010 06:29 PM, Dan Engel wrote:
> From a purely personal point of view, I'd be happy with ANY disk or
> memory password cache for Subversion on Linux that is safe
> (security-wise) and doesn't rely on the presence of any GUI libraries or
> capabilities. The gpg-agent path was just the easiest one for me to
> implement directly.

FWIW, I appreciate that you're taking a look at this, Dan.  I know that many
corporate customers of Subversion desperately want additional encrypted
password caching options that, as you say, don't rely on GUI libraries.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Reply via email to