On Wed, 2011-02-02, [email protected] wrote: > Author: cmpilato > Date: Wed Feb 2 17:16:40 2011 > New Revision: 1066540 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1066540&view=rev > Log: > * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c > (svn_ra_serf__discover_vcc): Fix while() condition to avoid bailing > out of loop too early.
What is the functional change? (Bug fix?) - Julian > While here, correct an error message that > referred to an OPTIONS request when a PROPFIND was used. > > Modified: > subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c > > Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c?rev=1066540&r1=1066539&r2=1066540&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c (original) > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c Wed Feb 2 17:16:40 2011 > @@ -1807,12 +1807,12 @@ svn_ra_serf__discover_vcc(const char **v > } > } > while ((path[0] != '\0') > - && (! (path[0] == '/') && (path[1] == '\0'))); > + && (! (path[0] == '/' && path[1] == '\0'))); > > if (!*vcc_url) > { > return svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_RA_DAV_OPTIONS_REQ_FAILED, NULL, > - _("The OPTIONS response did not include the " > + _("The PROPFIND response did not include the " > "requested version-controlled-configuration " > "value")); > } > >
