"C. Michael Pilato" <[email protected]> writes:
> On 02/10/2011 11:28 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Suppose I have a directory tree:
>>
>> foo/
>> bar/
>> zig
>>
>> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar. What
>> should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should it revert foo/bar?
>> How much of foo/bar should it restore?
>
> It should restore foo/bar as a directory with all of its children still
> scheduled for deletion, right?
Perhaps, but if I deleted the tree foo/bar and didn't replace it with a
file then the revert would skip foo/bar and leave it deleted. I would
need to do "svn revert --depth=immediates" to revert foo/bar and leave
the children deleted.
Before revert:
path op_depth
0 1 2
/ normal
foo normal
foo/bar normal - normal
foo/bar/zig normal - deleted
Revert the added file to leave the deleted directory:
path op_depth
0 1 2
/ normal
foo normal
foo/bar normal - deleted
foo/bar/zig normal - deleted
Non-recursive revert on the directory:
path op_depth
0 1 2 3
/ normal
foo normal
foo/bar normal
foo/bar/zig normal - - deleted
So a replacement WORKING file changes depth=files into depth=immediates
for those nodes?
--
Philip
