On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] wrote on Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 16:59:54 -0000: >> Author: hwright >> Date: Tue Feb 8 16:59:54 2011 >> New Revision: 1068477 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1068477&view=rev >> Log: >> * tools/dev/svnraisetreeconflict/main.c >> (raise_tree_conflict): Use the correct int type to avoid a bit-length >> warning. > >> - int peg_rev1, peg_rev2; >> + long peg_rev1, peg_rev2; > > svn_revnum_t ?
We don't use them as revnums. They values store the output of atol(), which should be long. The names could perhaps be updated to reflect that, but ENOCARE. -Hyrum
