Yes, please file an issue, and in the meantime I'll re-add it to my list. (There are a few things ahead of it...)
Thanks! Daniel Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 21:29:27 +1100: > Hi Daniel, > > Just checking as to whether or not you think you'll be able to get to this > submission or not, please? > I'm more than happy to log it into the Issue Tracker, if you feel that time > is getting the better of you. > > > > On 08/01/2011, at 5:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > I'll add it to my list, but as I'll have to read the whole thing before > > answering it might take a while until I'll answer. > > > > If anyone else wants to beat me to it... > > > > > > Erik Johansson wrote on Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 22:43:43 +0100: > >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 19:15, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > >> wrote: > >>> I can't find a summary anywhere in your mail. Is the summary "Here is > >>> a work-in-progress patch that revvs the struct and adds a mod_props > >>> member, and below are the specific semantics I'm thinking of for that > >>> member; please review those semantics"? > >> > >> Yes it is, sorry for leaving that out. I was trying to get all the > >> cases right that I totally forgot to add a summary. I'm interested in > >> getting your input on the implementation and what you think about the > >> proposed semantics. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> // Erik > >> > >> -- > >> Erik Johansson > >> Home Page: http://ejohansson.se/ > >> PGP Key: http://ejohansson.se/erik.asc >
