Quick reply to address just this one point: Neil Bird wrote on Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 14:01:34 +0000: > All that added to the fact that the revision numbers seem to have > all changed (the move from Tigris to Apache?), so even when the > comments *do* say that they're fixing blah from rev. xxx, the xxx is > wrong.
The magic is "add 840074 to the old revnum to get the new one": http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/README
