Paul Burba <ptbu...@gmail.com> wrote on 03/02/2011 10:10:40 AM: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:44 AM, C. Michael Pilato > <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > > On 03/02/2011 10:40 AM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: > >> "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote on 01/28/2011 01:44:26 PM: > >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for issue #3789 log -g regression in r1028108 > >>> > >>> On 01/26/2011 05:59 PM, Kevin Radke wrote: > >>> > This also needs a back-port to the 1.6.x branch. > >>> > > >>> > [[[ > >>> > Fix issue #3789: Correctly ignore missing locations when a > renamed file > >>> > has more than MAX_OPEN_HISTORIES. > >>> > > >>> > * subversion/libsvn_repos/log.c > >>> > (get_path_histories): Ignore more bogus repository > locations to restore > >>> > pre-1.6.15 log -g behavior. This fixes > >>> client chunk > >>> > errors introduced by r1028108. > >>> > ]]] > >>> > >>> Committed this in r1064839 with tweaks to the log message. (Rather than > >>> open a new issue, I just reopened issue 3270). Will propose for > backport to > >>> 1.6.x, too. Thanks, Kevin. > >> > >> Was this ever proposed for backport? (Or am I just missing it in STATUS?) > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?view=markup > >> > >> This does fix a regression introduced with 1.6.15... > > > > Pretty confident that it did. I believe it's the "More fixes for issue > > #3270" item in CHANGES on the 1.6.x branch. > > Scratch "pretty confident" and insert "certain": > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1072344
Excellent. Thanks for double checking this. (And thanks for not slapping my hand too hard for not looking in the CHANGES file... :)) Kevin R.
