On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 07:29, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: >... > Extend Subversion's v2 HTTP protocol to include URIs that allow the > client to define the transaction name visible in on the wire. > > If the client sends, or a proxy injects, an SVN-VTxn-Name header with > the POST request it defines the transaction name to be returned to the > client in the POST response. If the client recieves the new > SVN-VTxn-Name header it uses that name in the new URIs in the requests > that make up the commit.
I don't understand why the *client* needs to read that header. The base URI that the server returns already has the proper txn name, right? Sending *to* the server creates the "client-provided" feature that you want to retain. I just don't understand the other direction. Cheers, -g
