C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 03/15/2011 10:15 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > > > > I wonder, why this patch was not considered for fixing issue 3826. I > > could see a fix 1081799 which I see very similar to what I have > > done. Did I miss anything here? > > No, I simply overlooked your patch by accident. Of course, that was easy to > do when the issue tracker doesn't point to your patch at all. In the > future, if you have a patch for an issue, I would suggest that you either a) > add a comment to the issue tracker which points to your patch's appearance > on the mailing list, or b) attach your patch to the issue. Then add the > 'patch' keyword to the issue. > > Sorry for the duplicated effort. No offense was intended, to be sure.
Noorul, I'm sorry I didn't answer your last email about your patch. - Julian
