[email protected] wrote on Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 14:46:39 -0000:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Tue Mar 29 14:46:38 2011
> New Revision: 1086607
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086607&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix issue #3014, "svn log | head" should not print "Write error: Broken pipe".
>
> Make svn and other commands exit silently (with EXIT_FAILURE) if a pipe write
> error occured. The rationale being that the process closing the pipe is also
> responsible for printing a related error message, if necessary.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/cmdline.c
> (svn_cmdline_fputs, svn_cmdline_fflush): Return
> SVN_ERR_IO_PIPE_WRITE_ERROR when writes fail due to EPIPE, so that
> callers can choose to ignore this kind of error.
> (svn_cmdline_handle_exit_error): Don't print message for pipe write errors.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
> (do_io_file_wrapper_cleanup): Return SVN_ERR_IO_PIPE_WRITE_ERROR when writes
> fail due to EPIPE.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/opt.c
> (svn_opt_print_generic_help2): Don't print message for pipe write errors.
>
> * subversion/svn/notify.c
> (notify): Same.
>
> * subversion/svn/main.c
> (main): Same.
>
> * subversion/svn/obliterate-cmd.c
> (notify): Same.
>
> * subversion/svnadmin/main.c
> (main): Same.
>
> * subversion/include/svn_error_codes.h
> (SVN_ERR_IO_PIPE_WRITE_ERROR): New error code.
>
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/cmdline.c
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/cmdline.c?rev=1086607&r1=1086606&r2=1086607&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/cmdline.c (original)
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/cmdline.c Tue Mar 29 14:46:38 2011
> @@ -338,7 +338,19 @@ svn_cmdline_fputs(const char *string, FI
> if (fputs(out, stream) == EOF)
> {
> if (errno)
> - return svn_error_wrap_apr(errno, _("Write error"));
> + {
> + err = svn_error_wrap_apr(errno, _("Write error"));
> +
> + /* ### Issue #3014: Return a specific error for broken pipes,
> + * ### with a single element in the error chain. */
> + if (APR_STATUS_IS_EPIPE(err->apr_err))
> + {
> + svn_error_clear(err);
So you're doing:
* get error number
* construct an svn_error_t object (that's includes a few malloc()s)
* check error number
* destroy svn_error_t object
Won't it be simpler to avoid constructing the svn_error_t object in the
first place (when errno is EPIPE)?
> + return svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_IO_PIPE_WRITE_ERROR, NULL,
> NULL);
> + }
> + else
> + return svn_error_return(err);
> + }
> else
> return svn_error_create
> (SVN_ERR_IO_WRITE_ERROR, NULL, NULL);
> @@ -355,7 +367,19 @@ svn_cmdline_fflush(FILE *stream)
> if (fflush(stream) == EOF)
> {
> if (errno)
> - return svn_error_wrap_apr(errno, _("Write error"));
> + {
> + svn_error_t *err = svn_error_wrap_apr(errno, _("Write error"));
> +
> + /* ### Issue #3014: Return a specific error for broken pipes,
> + * ### with a single element in the error chain. */
> + if (APR_STATUS_IS_EPIPE(err->apr_err))
> + {
> + svn_error_clear(err);
> + return svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_IO_PIPE_WRITE_ERROR, NULL,
> NULL);
> + }
> + else
> + return svn_error_return(err);
> + }
> else
> return svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_IO_WRITE_ERROR, NULL, NULL);
> }
> @@ -376,7 +400,15 @@ svn_cmdline_handle_exit_error(svn_error_
> apr_pool_t *pool,
> const char *prefix)
> {
> - svn_handle_error2(err, stderr, FALSE, prefix);
> + /* Issue #3014:
> + * Don't print anything on broken pipes. The pipe was likely
> + * closed by the process at the other end. We expect that
> + * process to perform error reporting as necessary.
> + *
> + * ### This assumes that there is only one error in a chain for
> + * ### SVN_ERR_IO_PIPE_WRITE_ERROR. See svn_cmdline_fputs(). */
> + if (err->apr_err != SVN_ERR_IO_PIPE_WRITE_ERROR)
> + svn_handle_error2(err, stderr, FALSE, prefix);
This ### seems easy enough to avoid, isn't it? i.e., why did you need
to assume a single-link chain?
> svn_error_clear(err);
> if (pool)
> svn_pool_destroy(pool);
>
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c?rev=1086607&r1=1086606&r2=1086607&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c (original)
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c Tue Mar 29 14:46:38 2011
> @@ -3034,6 +3034,11 @@ do_io_file_wrapper_cleanup(apr_file_t *f
> name = NULL;
> svn_error_clear(err);
>
> + /* ### Issue #3014: Return a specific error for broken pipes,
> + * ### with a single element in the error chain. */
> + if (APR_STATUS_IS_EPIPE(status))
> + return svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_IO_PIPE_WRITE_ERROR, NULL, NULL);
> +
> if (name)
> return svn_error_wrap_apr(status, _(msg),
> svn_dirent_local_style(name, pool));
>
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/opt.c
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/opt.c?rev=1086607&r1=1086606&r2=1086607&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/opt.c (original)
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/opt.c Tue Mar 29 14:46:38 2011
> @@ -383,7 +383,15 @@ svn_opt_print_generic_help2(const char *
> return;
>
> print_error:
> - svn_handle_error2(err, stderr, FALSE, "svn: ");
> + /* Issue #3014:
> + * Don't print anything on broken pipes. The pipe was likely
> + * closed by the process at the other end. We expect that
> + * process to perform error reporting as necessary.
> + *
> + * ### This assumes that there is only one error in a chain for
> + * ### SVN_ERR_IO_PIPE_WRITE_ERROR. See svn_cmdline_fputs(). */
> + if (err->apr_err != SVN_ERR_IO_PIPE_WRITE_ERROR)
> + svn_handle_error2(err, stderr, FALSE, "svn: ");
This bit of code (including the comment, the ###, and the specific
condition) is repeated N times below.
Abstract it into a private helper macro?
