Bert Huijben wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:39:43 +0200: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:[email protected]] > > Isn't this the price we pay for our design choice of single db? i.e., > > unless it's designly sane to ask the wq runner to run only the wq items > > pertaining to a subtree of the working copy? > > For wq operations it doesn't matter whenever they run -they are all (or > should be) 100% restartable - so you can just run these whenever you want.
I'm not concerned about the "when", I'm concerned about the case that the wq contains work items affecting /foo/bar while I'm trying to cleanup /foo11/bar39.
