A user supplied me with results of running the benchmarks with 1.5, 1.6 and 1.7 on Windows. I have updated the wiki with those results.
There was one area of the tests that I thought were interesting, because there is a massive regression in 1.6. The tests are with a working copy that has folders with a couple thousand icons in it. I mainly wanted to look for problems with a lot of files in one folder as people on users@ had been complaining. You can see those results here: https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/go/wiki2115 Here are the average checkout/switch times: Checkout Switch 1.5: 0:30 0:18 1.6: 7:40 7:15 1.7 2:14 1:46 So while 1.7 has made nice improvements over 1.6, there is still a huge regression. I would blame it on tree conflicts, but would this show up in a checkout (maybe because it shares code with update)? Might be something for someone to look at. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
