On Apr 10, 2011 3:26 PM, "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > > Sent: zondag 10 april 2011 7:26 > > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1090715 - > > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/commit_util.c > > > > On Apr 9, 2011 7:54 PM, <rhuij...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Author: rhuijben > > > Date: Sat Apr 9 23:54:31 2011 > > > New Revision: 1090715 > > > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1090715&view=rev > > > Log: > > > Two small optimizations in the commit handler: Assume absolute paths are > > > already absolute and only send fulltexts for local additions, instead of > > > for additions and copies. > > > > It is unclear that item->path is absolute. Ideally, renaming the field > would > > be best. At a minimum, add a comment here. > > This field in commit_item3_t and its older cousins *2_t and *_t are > documented to be absolute paths since the early days (r841696, or r1622), > when the log message editor api was introduced.
Ah. Thanks. IOW, it just hasn't caught up to our recent naming scheme. ... Fair enuf! Cheers, -g
