Ivan Zhakov wrote on Mon, May 16, 2011 at 15:17:50 +0200: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 14:49, Justin Erenkrantz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hyrum K Wright <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> We can. > >> > >> HTTP access has *always* been an optional bit of the Subversion > >> client, and using neon, either as the default or not, should not pose > >> a problem with ASF guidelines (so long as we don't distribute neon, > >> which we no longer do). > > > Cool, so we don't have legal objections for making neon default > library in svn 1.7.
*nod*
