On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:36:21AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:39, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >... > > Wasn't it JavaHL that failed to compile? If we want developers to > > always compile the Java bindings then why don't we remove it as a > > separate build target and just make it part of our default? > > You're right. We should probably Just Do This. > > We've gone back and forth on bindings for a long time now. I don't > really see much of a problem if we just built them by default (any > bindings that are configured for the local machine, that is). > > Ten years ago? Yeah... compiles weren't exactly speedy. But today? > Pfft. Compile it all. :-) > > Thoughts, people?
No objections. I already have my build automated to do this. Except if you do this please provide a way to explicitly turn specific bindings off at configure time. E.g. JavaHL does *not* build with threadless APR and I really have no idea how to fix that, I've tried...
