On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >> I do not get the impression that 1.4 is the relevant fact here. It >> seems like the issue is just that svn upgrade needs to contact the >> repository? So you cannot upgrade a WC that needs to be relocated? >> >> This does not sound like a real world problem. > > What the old version is, is not relevant. (See other reply: Before 1.7 we > can never be sure if we have all the information in the working copy or not) > > The question is more: Is this problem relevant enough to support this > scenario on 'svn upgrade'.
To be clear the scenario is do we need to support upgrading an old working copy that does not point at a currently valid server location. IMHO, it is perfectly acceptable to require a new checkout in this unlikely scenario. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
