On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:40, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > On 06/15/2011 12:36 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >... >> I would also request that should the serf issues be resolved during >> our stabilization period, that we ship with the default as serf. ie. >> don't toss it because it may miss the branchpoint by a couple days >> (trying to avoid that, tho!) > > Sure, no sweat. It's not really until we're close to rolling RC1 that we > need to make the go/no-go call on Serf as the default.
Thanks. I just called it out because it is arguable to (say) ship a beta with one default, and RC1 with another. Figured people should be aware (even though that may not play in my favor :-P ) Cheers, -g
