On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Paul Burba <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Paul Burba <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Hyrum K Wright <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> The next in our series of 1.7.0 prereleases is now posted for testing >>> and siging: 1.7.0-alpha2. These are cut from trunk, and the magic rev >>> is r1137713. The buildbots were green at that rev, and all tests pass >>> for me locally. You can find them here: >>> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-alpha2/ >>> >>> As with the previous alpha release and there are obviously known >>> issues (but hopefully fewer of them!) The purpose is to give >>> distributors and downstream consumers a concrete milestone against >>> which to test, as well as vet our release processes on ASF >>> infrastructure. As you may expect, these prereleases are intended for >>> intrepid users and testers only. >>> >>> Since 1.7.0-alpha1, I've made a number of changes to the release >>> scripts, so please make sure the distribution tarballs contain >>> everything you'd expect them to. >>> >>> I hope to get signatures from folks by the end of Wednesday, June 22, >>> and then do the public announcement. Historically, we've not required >>> a full set of signatures for alphas and betas, but it would be nice to >>> get at least some coverage besides just my own. As you send in your >>> signature announcement, please note any issues you found with the >>> alpha release (these will be included in the public announcement). >>> Please send sigs here: >>> http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub/svn/collect_sigs.py >>> >>> -Hyrum >> >> SUMMARY: >> --------- >> +1 to release >> >> VERIFIED: >> --------- >> Hyrum's sig for >> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-alpha2/deploy/subversion-1.7.0-alpha2.zip >> >> Other than the expected differences in >> subversion/include/svn_version.h, >> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-alpha2/deploy/subversion-1.7.0-alpha2.zip >> is the same as https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk@1137713. >> >> TESTED: >> ------- >> [Release-Build] x[ fsfs | bdb ] x [ file | svn | http (neon) | http (serf) ] >> Ruby bindings > > I forgot to mention that I tested the JavaHL bindings too (which passed).
Didn't your mail include an attachement with a build failure of the JavaHL bindings? I didn't see an explanation in that mail, and not I'm curious how you tested the bindings if you couldn't build them. -Hyrum
