On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
Stefan Sperling<s...@elego.de> writes:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:12:22PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:01 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
+svn bisect start [-rN[:M]]
+
When we discussed you had a concern that above syntax is different from
the normal svn sub command syntax. Is this finalized?
I wouldn't say it's finalized.. I simply wrote down a spec as a rough draft.
I'm sure the community will have some ideas about this. (Like implementing
a sub-subcommand interface of some sort.)
I'd say just have a set of long options that are mutually exclusive,
one for each "subcommand".
svn bisect --start
svn bisect --good
etc.
This will be easiest to do with the current argument parsing code, and
also means people can type things in any order they like (--good -r42,
or -r42 --good).
Do we really need to use -r to mention revision?
How about --good<rev> --bad<rev> ?
Is this complicated with the existing parser?
Thanks and Regards
Noorul
Yeah, the current system will not work well with --good <rev>.
We need to say -r<rev>
