On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 06:14:27AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote: > Sure, but we haven't even released beta1 yet. I'm saying that we nuke > it as "already not what we want to deliver". > > At the "beta" point, it seems that we'd really like to be much closer > to reality. Alphas are pretty throw-away, but betas... we want to be > close. And we already know that this unreleased beta1 doesn't match > what we want to release.
We've already put time into beta1 for testing and signing. I'd say just post it and then start the beta2 (or RC1) train right away. The tarballs are always going to lag behind repository history. People who run these betas are voluntary testers who can cope with known problems.
