On Fri, 2011-07-22, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Julian Foad <julian.f...@wandisco.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-07-21, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > >> The next prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and > >> signing: 1.7.0-beta2. > > > > +1 to release (Unix). > > > > My two signatures were successfully collected by your script. > > > > Tested: > > > > [ bdb | fsfs ] x [ ra_local | ra_svn | ra_neon | ra_serf ] > > swig-py > > swig-pl > > swig-rb > > > > (I also built ctypes-python and javahl, but couldn't get their tests > > to run. I'm assuming that's a local problem. It's not a new problem.) > > > > Environment: > > > > OS/Platform: > > Ubuntu 10.10, 2.6.35-30-generic i686 GNU/Linux > > > > Using no in-tree build of dependencies. > > > > Using Ubuntu distribution-supplied packages: > > libapr1 1.4.2-3ubuntu1 > > libaprutil1 1.3.9+dfsg-3build1 > > libdb-dev 4.8 > > openssl 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4 > > perl 5.10.1-12ubuntu2 > > python 2.6.6-2ubuntu1 > > python 2.6.6-2ubuntu2 > > zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3ubuntu1 > > ruby 1.8.7 > > neon 0.29.3 > > > > Using self-built packages: > > serf 0.7.2 > > > > Results: > > > > make check ... (8 ways): No failures. > > > > Signatures: > > > > ::: subversion-1.5.9.tar.bz2 ::: > > Typo? > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- [...]
Oops, those are old sigs. The correct sigs are: ::: subversion-1.7.0-beta2.tar.bz2 ::: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk4pjbQACgkQNR8z5DU+Jbyp4ACgi3OEGaxS//W/nb0TytqVhUvU nWcAnj3yutmU0aYnnLwkE4qFoOrGs2/v =8xfU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ::: subversion-1.7.0-beta2.tar.gz ::: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk4pjbQACgkQNR8z5DU+JbywHwCbBP1e+xft8atZ6+Y//dLJ2U18 chYAoJAqOuFaGBlP5TB5yfijKuQdiGSu =AAJB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- (I believe I posted the correct sigs to the sig collection web page, as it reported success whereas it would have reported the old sigs as 'bad'.) - Julian
