Stefan Küng wrote on Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 21:41:42 +0200: > On 04.08.2011 21:36, Greg Stein wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 15:20, Mark Phippard<markp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>... > >>vote for their preference. I am not saying that the simple majority > >>decision of this vote should become the default. > > > >Not until I'm convinced to remove my veto. We've discussed several > >times that the future direction lies with serf, and I believe it is a > >wrong choice to move us away from that. The issue tracker has not had > >any serf-related bugs for a while, so there is nothing to indicate > >"not ready". > > Nothing in the issue tracker is not really an indication of > stability: many problems I had with serf (and other TSVN users) are > not reproducible without access to private (non public) servers, so > I never reported them on this list, and of course I wouldn't know > what to put in an issue. >
If a bug can't be reproduced publicly that doesn't mean it's not a bug. But if a bug is not reported to dev@ or issues@, that /does/ mean it's not a bug. > Stefan > > -- > ___ > oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile" > (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN > \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control > /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
