On 08/12/2011 12:55 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:33:43AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: >>> Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: >>>> Hi stsp, >>>> >>>> check this WIP patch out, attached. (I've also appended a wild test script >>>> that runs all sorts of things. Reading its bottom-most output may suffice.) >>>> >>>> I'd prefer printing the paths relative to the "current working dir" instead >>>> of relative to the WC root (as this patch does now). >>> >>> +1, for consistency with other 'svn' output.
That comma makes all the difference :) >> >> If this is done for 'svn status' the same should be done for 'svn info' >> which currently prints moved-from/-to relative the WC root as well. > Ah, right, I should have spotted that. +1 to both. Discussing 'svn info' output: What do you think, for moved-here items, should we rename "Copied From URL" and "Copied From Rev" to "Moved From *"? Leaving "Copied From *" as-is will be confusing to the average user person... #svn: "lol it says both copied and moved !?!1! Should be a tree conflict!1!" Same discussion pending for --xml output. We probably don't want to add a "Copied From Path" line: it's neither as interesting nor as easy. A copy doesn't need to commit two paths in one, and last time I checked we didn't store local paths for copied-from. BTW, do we have any ambition to provide 'svn mv' using a URL source? :) ~Neels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
