On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:37:57PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > However, clearing move-info if one half is reverted is simpler to > implement because we don't have to deal with cases where we cannot > revert the other half without destroying other local changes (e.g. a > file replacing the delete half of a move). > The behaviour is also much easier to explain because there are no > special cases. > > Hmmm... I'll think about it. Thanks for raising this concern.
I've decided to go for this approach. See r1157246.
