On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:40:28AM +0100, Philip Martin wrote: > Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> writes: > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 04:57:37PM -0600, Kevin Locke wrote: > > >> $ svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk testdir > >> svn: E000001: Can't set permissions on > >> '<path>/testdir/.svn/tmp/svn-HZAmRw': Operation not permitted > > > + err = file_perms_set2(tempfile, perms); > > + if (err) > > + { > > + /* Some POSIX systems (e.g. Linux) support filesystems which > > + * do not have POSIX semantics. The OS should ideally ignore > > + * attempts to tweak POSIX permission bits on such filesystems, > > + * but in some cases we get errors. > > + * E.g. NTFS on Linux will throw EPERM. Ignore this error and > > + * leave the permission bits in their current state. */ > > + if (APR_STATUS_IS_EPERM(err->apr_err)) > > + svn_error_clear(err); > > + else > > + return svn_error_trace(err); > > Is APR_STATUS_IS_EPERM going to catch E000001?
Yes. On Linux (which Kevin is using) E000001 is EPERM. $ cd /home/stsp/src/linux $ grep EPERM include/asm-generic/errno-base.h #define EPERM 1 /* Operation not permitted */
