On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:06 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > On 08/23/2011 06:29 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> - Bert points out that the HTTPv2 code may not interact well with >> clients committing via the svn.eu mirror to an HTTPv2-enabled svn.us. > > Hrm, I can't think of any scenarios in which having a newer master version > than slave version will cause issues. (It's the reverse case that can be > problematic.) But then, I'm not completely awake yet, either.
Although I don't want to be playing fast-and-loose with the ASF repo, running the RC on svn.apache.org would give us just the type of testing in these types of scenarios that's difficult to do manually. Assuming there is a decent "what to do if this thing borks the server" plan, I'm +1. -Hyrum -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com/
