On 08/30/2011 10:11 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:01:26 -0400: >> Would it make more sense to just replace the warning at the end with a >> single instance of each of the various mid-stream warnings? Or are all such >> warnings not quite as redundant as this one? > > But then people have to finish the dump (successfully! ie, without > hitting any corruption or other error partway through) before they see > that "FYI, the data you've just dumped isn't self-contained" warning. > > Reporting error conditions as early as possible seems preferable.
Yep, makes perfect sense. +1 to move forward per your plan. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
