On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:56:43AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: > Oops - something's wrong with that pattern. Did you mean .../ids/(rev % > 1000000)/(rev % 1000) which would give > > db/successors/ids/0/0 r0..r999 > db/successors/ids/0/1 r1000..r1999 > ... ... > db/successors/ids/0/999 r999000..r999999 > db/successors/ids/1/0 r1000000..r1000999 > ... ... > > ?
Yes, of course. Thanks :)
